Information Overload: Excessive information can overwhelm users, reducing their performance and increasing the effort required to use the system (Türetken et al., 2019).
Control Familiarity: Familiar controls enhance user comfort and efficiency, leading to better performance and lower effort expectancy (Türetken et al., 2019).
UI Fit: The alignment of the UI with user tasks and expectations significantly impacts user acceptance and performance (Türetken et al., 2019).
Consistency: Consistent design across different devices ensures a seamless user experience, which is crucial for multi-terminal interfaces like smartphones, tablets, and smartwatches (Li et al., 2022).
Responsive Design: Adapting the layout and design elements to different screen sizes and devices is essential for maintaining usability and user satisfaction (Li et al., 2022).
.png)
Menu-Based vs. Command-Based: Menu-based interfaces are generally perceived as easier to use and more useful compared to command-based interfaces, which influences users' behavioral intention to use the system (Hasan & Ahmed, 2007).
Trust Factors: Trustworthy interfaces encourage user engagement and acceptance. Factors such as transparency, reliability, and user control are critical in designing trustworthy UIs (Zieglmeier & Lehene, 2021).
Personality-Based Design: Adapting UIs to match users' personality traits can enhance user experience and satisfaction. Different personality types may prefer different design features and aesthetics (Alves et al., 2020).
Energy Saving: Good UI design not only improves usability but can also contribute to energy savings by optimizing the interaction process (Bødker, 2021).
Türetken, O., Ondracek, J., & Ijsselsteijn, W. (2019). Influential Characteristics of Enterprise Information System User Interfaces. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 59, 243 - 255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1339367
Li, W., Zhou, Y., Luo, S., & Dong, Y. (2022). Design Factors to Improve the Consistency and Sustainable User Experience of Responsive Interface Design. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159131
Hasan, B., & Ahmed, M. (2007). Effects of interface style on user perceptions and behavioral intention to use computer systems. Comput. Hum. Behav., 23, 3025-3037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.016
Zieglmeier, V., & Lehene, A. (2021). Designing Trustworthy User Interfaces. Proceedings of the 33rd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1145/3520495.3520525
Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Scarr, J., & Malacria, S. (2014). Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47, 1 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659796
Alves, T., Natálio, J., Henriques-Calado, J., & Gama, S. (2020). Incorporating personality in user interface design: A review. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109709
Bødker, S. (2021). User Interfaces. Through the Interface.
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003063971-4
